Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] A retrospect on 'CMakeLists.txt' policy review
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-06-02 21:19:54

Steven Watanabe <watanabesj <at>> writes:

> On 06/02/2016 07:26 PM, Louis Dionne wrote:
> > [...]
> All of these arguments depend solely on the
> existence of build/, regardless of whether
> it contains a CMakeLists.txt or not. For separately
> compiled libraries, build/ *must* exist because
> that's the layout that we've chosen for Boost.Build.

I understand that, and would conform if Hana had something to build.

> For header-only libraries, like hana, it's not needed
> and should not exist, making this point moot.
> I just looked at your top-level CMakeLists.txt and it
> seems like it should be acceptable even by the strictest
> possible reading of the requirements. It definitely
> does not belong in build/.

Yay! Then all is fine as far as I'm concerned.


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at