Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Cxx dual library
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-06-04 09:15:24

On 3 Jun 2016 at 20:18, Edward Diener wrote:

> > I'll remind the list of my non-macro alternative to this macro-based
> > approach which has been in production use since 2014 and which I
> > presented at C++ Now 2015. It can be found within
> >
> I could never understand your documentation or else I might have tried
> to compare CXXD to what you have done in my doc.

Is not the Readme on the front of the github for not clear?

If you do write a small program using both CXXD and boost-lite you'll
surely notice the many APIs not covered by boost-lite e.g. all of
<tuple>. My coverage is extremely conservative and incomplete to
prevent interop surprises. My approach also only works for C++ 11
compilers, I deliberately exclude 03 usage so things like move
construction don't surprise.

Nevertheless, it provides everything I need for my own libraries to
dispense with the mandatory Boost dependency, which is its primary
purpose. You're attempting something much more ambitious in CXXD.


ned Productions Limited Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at