Subject: Re: [boost] double_ended - request formal review
From: Ronald Garcia (rxg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-07-21 08:48:19
I have received your request and have added it to the review schedule.
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 5:51 PM, Benedek Thaler <thalerbenedek_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Dear Boost,
> I'd like to request the review of the double_ended library.
> Code: https://github.com/erenon/double_ended
> Documentation: http://erenon.hu/double_ended
> The library contains two classes. Excerpt from the documentation:
> * `devector` is a hybrid of the standard vector and deque containers, as
> well as the small_vector of Boost.Container. It offers cheap (amortized
> constant time) insertion at both the front and back ends, while also
> providing the regular features of std::vector, in particular the contiguous
> underlying memory. In contrast to the standard vector, however, devector
> offers greater control over its internals. Like small_vector, it can store
> elements internally without dynamically allocating memory.
> * `batch_deque` is very similar to the standard deque, with a slight twist.
> It lets you specify its segment size: The size of the contiguous memory
> segments it uses to store its elements. This provides a consistent layout
> across platforms, and lets you iterate over the segments with batch
> I'm also looking for a review manager.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk