Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [container] small_flat_set and small_flat_map
From: Sam Kellett (samkellett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-15 04:27:54

Given that Boost.Container has a small_vector now, would a piece of work
that changed flat_set and flat_map to use small_vector<0> internally be
feasible? I ask because I feel like if this was the case it would be almost
trivial to expose flat_tree<N> through small_flat_set<N> and
small_flat_map<N> types to provide the small size optimisation for these
two containers.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at