Subject: Re: [boost] Review Manager needed for stacktrace library
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-25 14:57:49
2016-10-24 21:49 GMT+03:00 Nat Goodspeed <nat_at_[hidden]>:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Antony Polukhin <antoshkka_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> More problems will arise with source
>> files and line numbers. May be you'd like a different solution? What
>> for are you willing to have such precise control?
> As I said, I want to be able to extract particular pieces of
> information without having to maintain backend-specific parsing of the
> string you emit.
> Ultimately, of course, it's all for human consumption, but you can't
> know the format I will consider ideal.
> It's great to be able to extract a single stacktrace entry, and it's
> good to have a "good enough" default formatting, but I'm just telling
> you what I would like even better. ;-)
Started implementing that: added begin/end functions, iterator and
class frame. Is it ok to have a nonmovable type for a stack frame?
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk