Subject: Re: [boost] [process] Formal Review starts today, 27 October
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-11-05 20:14:15
On 10/30/2016 02:21 PM, Bjorn Reese wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 08:26 AM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
>> - Whether you believe the library should be accepted into Boost
>> * Conditions for acceptance
> I withhold judgement for now to give the author an opportunity to
> respond. At the moment I am unsure whether to vote for conditional
> acceptance or rejection.
I vote for conditional acceptance, provided the following conditions are
1. The interface style must be redesigned such that:
a. There is a clear separation between arguments and attributes.
b. Arguments and attributes should not be arbitrarily interspersed
in the parameter list.
c. A set of attributes can be build in advance, and reused for
different child processes.
d. Attributes can be optionally to the attribute-set.
2. There should be no I/O deadlocks by default.
3. An Overview section that introduces the concepts and the various
parts of the library must be added to the documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk