Subject: Re: [boost] Synapse library review starts today December 2
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-03 12:56:50
Klemens Morgenstern wrote:
> But really having a void* as part of a public interface would've given you
> a no, even if everything else was perfect with this library.
This objection of yours doesn't make much sense to me. What problem are you
trying to prevent? Objects of different types don't typically share the same
address, so type safety can hardly be violated. Well, I suppose you could
use the wrong member of a union by mistake.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk