Subject: Re: [boost] [Stacktrace] review
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-15 08:37:35
Robert Ramey wrote:
> Because the semantics of BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION were changed and the
> documentation updated to the new semantics.
BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION did not exist before Boost.Exception, so no, it wasn't
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk