Subject: Re: [boost] [Stacktrace] review
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-15 08:36:28
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I meant that every library which used BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION now depends
> upon boost/throw_exception. Am I wrong about that?
Given that BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION and boost::throw_exception are defined in
boost/throw_exception.hpp, yes, obviously. It has never been otherwise.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk