Subject: Re: [boost] [Stacktrace] review, please stop discussing non-Stacktrace issues
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-18 17:39:54
On 19/12/2016 06:26, Peter Dimov wrote:
> - the part that captures a stack trace and the part that resolves it to
> function/file/line should be separate, and usable without each other.
> - ideally, both ought to be async safe, or as async safe as possible on
> the target architecture.
Agreed for capturing.
But I don't think there should be any requirement to make resolving a
trace be async-safe. There's rarely going to be anything useful you
could do with such a trace that would also be async-safe; it'd be better
to require that this be done in regular context instead.
And I doubt all (any?) platforms would be capable of doing so, anyway.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk