Subject: Re: [boost] [Stacktrace] review, please stop discussing non-Stacktrace issues
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-19 09:07:34
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Yes, if the only way to do that is fork+exec then that is not usable for
> me, not as the default implementation of the stacktrace decoding
> algorithm. If such functionality is provided, it should be strictly
> optional and disabled by default (i.e. on Windows don't start the helper
> process unless the user explicitly requests that in runtime). Let the
> decoding algorithm itself be not-signal-safe but in-process.
Why is spawning a process to do the decoding unacceptable?
I'm sorry if you already explained this in a previous message.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk