Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [EXTERNAL] Boost 1.63.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-20 15:36:45


On 12/20/16 22:40, Belcourt, Kenneth wrote:
>
>> On Dec 20, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/20/2016 11:46 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We're waiting for the bots to cycle for a Boost.Config change, and then
>>>>>> we'll pick a couple bug fixes and turn an RC2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So, how is it going? The release schedule seems to be outdated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> As I mentioned to Marshall, the results here:
>>>> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/config.html are
>>>> horribly outdated - are they actually being run and updated?
>>>>
>>>
>>> It appears that all 'develop' tests are at least one week late if not much
>>> more.
>>
>>
>> I was not aware of the stalled results.. Investigating now.
>
> I think Sandia testers on Darwin and Linux are cycling okay in both develop and master, there’s results up there from Dec 20th. Are the Sandia config test results wrong or unexpected?

The latest results from Sandia that I can see are from 12th. The report
info[1] also says it was run last time on 12th.

[1]: http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/index.html


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk