Re: [boost] tensor library

Subject: Re: [boost] tensor library
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-01-09 16:35:14

On 1/9/17 1:16 PM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> On 09.01.2017 10:44, Paulo Pereira wrote:
>
>
> [...]
>
>> I fell that something similar
>> to this is very important for numerical calculations and somehow it is
>> not a standard in C++ (maybe I am missing something).
>
>
> There certainly already exist a bunch of such tools (Eigen, Blitz++,
> OpenVSIP, ...). They all promote specific programming and execution
> models tailored to particular problems or problem domains, so I expect
> it to be rather hard to convince anyone that either one of those should
> be considered a general solution favoured over the others. If it wasn't
> for that reason I'm sure we would already have such a library in Boost.
>
>         Stefan
>

We do have some pieces,  Quaternions, Octonions, QVM, uBlass multi_array 
and likely others.

Robert Ramey