Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Requirements: min and max macros
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-06 22:15:26

Next message: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [interprocess] Fix doc build ASAP"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [GIL] Bringing old bug fixes on development branch into regular boost releases"
In reply to: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Requirements: min and max macros"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] Requirements: min and max macros"

On 7/02/2017 00:48, Vinnie Falco wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Bjorn Reese <breese_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Is this guideline still relevant?
>
> I believe so, at least for Microsoft Visual C++ if you have not
> defined "NOMINMAX".

If the *application author* has not defined NOMINMAX. Libraries don't
get a choice in the matter, except for their own compiled source.

Next message: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [interprocess] Fix doc build ASAP"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [GIL] Bringing old bug fixes on development branch into regular boost releases"
In reply to: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Requirements: min and max macros"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] Requirements: min and max macros"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk