Subject: Re: [boost] [metal] Feature Complete - Request for Feedback
From: Deniz Bahadir (dbahadir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-22 11:02:00
Am 21.02.2017 um 21:41 schrieb Robert Ramey via Boost:
> On 2/21/17 10:21 AM, Deniz Bahadir via Boost wrote:
>> Am 21.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Bruno Dutra via Boost:
>> Our problem is, that we never really used Boost.MPL directly. We just
>> got it for "free" as a (costly) dependency through other Boost libraries
>> (e.g. Boost.MSM).
> What's "costly" about it? What are you refering to?
With "costly" I meant the compilation-times and the RAM-usage.
(Especially on GCC.)
But to be fair, probably it is not only Boost.MPLs fault. Some unlucky
decisions on our side concerning the design intensified this.
> Robert Ramey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk