Subject: Re: [boost] [MPL][vector] Is there interest in mpl::vector using variadic templates?
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-01 23:07:47
On 03/01/2017 12:56 PM, Antony Polukhin via Boost wrote:
> 2017-02-21 13:52 GMT+03:00 ÐÐ¸Ñ Ð°Ð¸Ð» ÐÐ°ÐºÑÐ¸Ð¼Ð¾Ð² via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
>> Dear community,
>> I've recently started contributing to boost::variant. To speed up variant's
>> compilation I'm implementing mpl::vector on variadic templates. For now
>> status of new vector implementation is:
>> made me wonder, is there interest in variadic templates implementation? Are
>> there limitations for it's usefulness, which I did not see?
> I'm very interested in patching MPL to be able to use variadic templates.
There was a variadic template mpl try from 7 years ago:
Maybe it could give you some ideas. OTOH, maybe it's *too* old :(
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk