Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-07 02:11:19

Next message: Adam Wulkiewicz: "Re: [boost] [gsoc17]Getting started with Project 2 in Boost.Geometry:R-tree serialization"
Previous message: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [preprocessing] Feedback requested on a C99 preprocessor written in pure universal Python"
In reply to: Tom Kent: "[boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Tom Kent via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> 2) Duplicate all the clang builds to build each version with both
> (acknowledging that will add nearly 1/3 to the already large ~125 linux
> runs).
>

Lets please avoid that until such a time that report generation is
considerably faster.

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
-- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail

Next message: Adam Wulkiewicz: "Re: [boost] [gsoc17]Getting started with Project 2 in Boost.Geometry:R-tree serialization"
Previous message: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] [preprocessing] Feedback requested on a C99 preprocessor written in pure universal Python"
In reply to: Tom Kent: "[boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [regression runner] Preference libstdc++ vs. libc++"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk