Subject: Re: [boost] [preprocessing] Feedback requested on a C99 preprocessor written in pure universal Python
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-07 22:33:36
> >> I am also *extremely* sure that I could not have developed a conforming
> >> C preprocessor in Boost.Spirit in just eighty hours of work.
> > I don't think your preprocessor is conforming.
> It is not. Apart from that one sentence above you chose to quote I have
> never claimed it was conforming, and on its Readme page at the front of
> its github is a list of known non-conformances.
The language you used in the paragraph above implies it was conforming.
Also, I thought you'd be interested in fixing your preprocessor, but alas -
you don't. I guess that's fine by me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk