Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] Review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-12 05:36:49

On 3/11/17 4:32 PM, Barrett Adair via Boost wrote:
> safe_base & operator--(int){ // post decrement
> safe_base old_t = *this;
> --(*this);
> return old_t;
> }
> If I'm reading correctly, this is UB (and likely a segfault).
correct - fixed
> I do think this library might be much more useful with floating point
> support, if it is eventually added.


Want to voluteer?

I'm sure that floating point would end up a lot more complex than first
meets the eye though.

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at