Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] review

Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] review
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-12 13:05:04

Robert Ramey wrote:
> I'm aware of this.  Boost doesn't require final form for a review.  I used 
> a form which easier for people to use without adding it to their boost 
> tree, running b2, etc.  Also b2 is a big obstacle for most people so I 
> supported CMake which is easier for me as well.

Well...

Given that I already have a Boost development setup, it'd have been much 
easier for me if I could drop the final form in libs/safe_numerics (or 
wherever it's meant to go) and b2 my way there.

But fair enough.