Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] review
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-12 13:05:04
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I'm aware of this. Boost doesn't require final form for a review. I used
> a form which easier for people to use without adding it to their boost
> tree, running b2, etc. Also b2 is a big obstacle for most people so I
> supported CMake which is easier for me as well.
Given that I already have a Boost development setup, it'd have been much
easier for me if I could drop the final form in libs/safe_numerics (or
wherever it's meant to go) and b2 my way there.
But fair enough.