Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] review
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-12 13:05:04
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I'm aware of this. Boost doesn't require final form for a review. I used
> a form which easier for people to use without adding it to their boost
> tree, running b2, etc. Also b2 is a big obstacle for most people so I
> supported CMake which is easier for me as well.
Given that I already have a Boost development setup, it'd have been much
easier for me if I could drop the final form in libs/safe_numerics (or
wherever it's meant to go) and b2 my way there.
But fair enough.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk