Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-14 23:07:49
On 15/03/2017 12:00, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> On 14.03.2017 17:53, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
>> "Only those who have managed a boost review can expect their library
>> submissions to be to be reviewed."
> The qualifications needed to write a boost-grade library and the
> qualifications needed to manage a review aren't the same. I don't think
> it's sensible to couple the two tasks in the suggested way.
Perhaps I am wrong, but I think it's already coupled the other way
around: currently in order to be a review manager you must first have
submitted (or otherwise maintain) a successful Boost library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk