Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: peterkochlarsen (peter.koch.larsen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-16 12:11:53


Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:20 AM, peterkochlarsen via wrote:
>> #12604 is still marked as open: I guess it should not be.
>> The same is the case for the second bug I examined (8485).
>
> Yes, a lot of the bugs in Trac should be closed (marked as fixed).
> I think we're more diligent in closing Github Issues than Trac Issues
> lately. We can change that (until we truly move to Github Issues).
>
>> Also bugs such as 6829 (slow in MSVC) should not be marked as such.
>
> Word choice "bug" versus "feature" aside, that one was also fixed, a
> long time ago.
>
> Glen

I believe many people are frightened by this, so it would be nice if we
could fix this situation. If trac is dying, I would propose that you closed
public access to the database or made it obvious for potential boosters that
the status of the issues are not to be trusted. Refer to github instead.

/Peter

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/review-queue-What-to-do-about-the-library-review-queue-tp4692273p4692347.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk