Subject: Re: [boost] Feedback request for Invariant Library idea
From: Attila Szenczi (melkonka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 10:37:17
Ohh, thanks, in this case i'll keep working on it.
2017-03-17 11:07 GMT+01:00 Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <
> 2017-03-17 10:43 GMT+01:00 Attila Szenczi via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]
> > Hello!
> > I knew about safe_numerics and i felt like it's different from what i
> > (tho i didn't check the whole lib)
> > However, i didn't know about constrained_value, and it seems like this
> > is exactly the same as mine. Even the design decisions are identical...
> > i reinvented the wheel. :'(
> This proves that the library is useful, and there is a demand for it. Your
> energy and motivation could still be used to get the library into Boost. I
> can see from the review schedule
> <http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html> that this
> constrained_value library was even accepted, but then orphaned.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk