Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [partly OT] Re: [review queue] What to do about the library review queue?
From: Stefan Seefeld (stefan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 15:26:18

On 17.03.2017 11:16, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> On 17.03.2017 10:40, Andrey Semashev via Boost wrote:
>> > I'm ok about recommending PRs but not issues. Bugs should be
>> reported to > the system chosen by the library maintainers. For some,
>> it is still > Trac.
> Some Boost libraries disable Github issues, presumably for this
> reason. But the main page needs to be simple and clear. It should
> direct people to>. Listing
> individual preferences on the main page doesn't scale.
>> I suggest each library gets its own home page (on
>>>, ...
> The libraries already get their own pages at
>> - they just need to use their
> README files as intended.

Sure, library maintainers can use>,
but these are not yet used as the canonical source of information. The
main library listings on don't point to those. Switching
from the centralized listing in to the
above (and similarly getting rid of would be one other
substantial step towards modularization.


      ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at