Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] Proposed new policy to enter the review queue
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-17 16:54:30
On 3/17/17 3:10 AM, Deniz Bahadir via Boost wrote:
> Probably, it would be a good idea to use some of the money Boost has to
> pay a professional web-designer to create a new, easier to use and
> appealing (aka "sexy") website. And then it should probably directly
> integrate the Boost Library Incubator.
> And if it were possible to rate the libraries (from the Incubator) with
> a simple (star-)system and allow reviews/comments directly via the
> website (both similar to Amazon) it would probably gather more interest.
That's possible right now on the incubator. It doesn't include all the
boost libraries - but it easily could.
I would love to see a whole restructuring of the Boost website and all
the stuff it's connected to. I agree it sorely needed. Actually the
incubator is my vision for Boost 2.0 - an easily navigable facade/lense
through which to view all of boost in a coherent way.
But as has been noted, website scripting is may more hacky and
problematic than C++, and that's saying something.
> Just my 2 cents.
> Deniz Bahadir
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk