Subject: Re: [boost] Attn: New Boost library policy text ready for approval
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-20 17:13:55
Robert Ramey wrote:
> This would effectively be the Boost Incubator version 2 - and there is
> nothing wrong with that. I could declare victory and retire the
> inclubator. Accepting a library would simply be a question of changing
> it's name or moving from the "Boost Submissions" super project to the
> "Boost" super project.
No, you misunderstood, this is not what I proposed. My suggestion was far
less ambitious, it was just to use a "dummy" repository under boostorg as an
issue list to track the submissions.
You misunderstanding however is not at all a bad idea in its own right. We
should consider that too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk