Subject: Re: [boost] Attn: New Boost library policy text ready for approval
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-20 17:29:17
Niall Douglas wrote:
> > Back on topic, I think that the current process of getting a library
> > into the review queue is a bit outdated. I suggest we make use of
> > existing infrastructure and make a Github repository "review" owned by
> > the Review Wizard in which submissions occur by way of the endorsing
> > Boost member creating an issue with the description of the library.
> The problem with this is that we don't want one member endorsing a library
> for review. We want *lots*.
> Almost without doubt when potential review managers scan the list of
> review pending libraries, they will prioritise those libraries with the
> most public endorsements.
How would they know which libraries have the most endorsements?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk