Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?

Subject: Re: [boost] [quickbook] diagnosing a missing [endsect]?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-22 22:26:10

On 22 March 2017 at 22:14, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>
>> Travis is an awful mechanism for doing that as it only runs when there's a
>> commit to the submodule being tested, which might not be regular.
>
>
> It's a stochastic testing method, three time winner of the highly acclaimed
> "still better than nothing" award.

It's a negligible difference.