Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: mp11
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-03-25 17:24:38

Bjorn Reese wrote:
> On 03/18/2017 02:50 PM, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>
> > but that's not much of an improvement. _t is the way to go with mp11.
>
> As _t for <type_traits> is C++14, what is the solution for C++11?

Well, you write the _t versions yourself on an as-needed basis, I suppose. 
:-)