Subject: Re: [boost] [simd] Hardware support
From: Joel FALCOU (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-10 12:58:07
On 10/04/2017 14:44, Bjorn Reese via Boost wrote:
> On 04/08/2017 01:06 PM, Mathias Gaunard via Boost wrote:
>> On 8 April 2017 at 11:14, Bjorn Reese via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
>> What does Boost.SIMD currently do on unsupported platforms? Revert
>>> back to SISD?
>> Yes, likewise if you're on x86 but requesting an operation that your
>> hardware does not support, it will still work using the best possible
> Is there any run-time overhead (e.g. induced by pack, load, save, etc.)
> in the SISD case?
This is a case we don't benchmark much but the strategy is to statically
unroll the scalar calls over the pack element which are store din an
std::array. So I suspect the overhead is not worth than having called
the scalar function Nth times.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk