Re: [boost] [config] What to call macros to indicate deprecated/removed components

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] What to call macros to indicate deprecated/removed components
From: Marcel Raad (raad_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-16 12:13:41

Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
> I like BOOST_NO_FEATURE for features just outright removed.
> 
> Removal probably doesn't require a C++ standard version in the macro
> since its effects are the same even if it happens many times over, for
> some reason. (e.g. If std::exchange was removed in C++20, then added
> back in C++2y, then removed in C++2z, there would be no difference
> between BOOST_CXX20_REMOVED_STD_EXCHANGE and
> BOOST_CXX2Z_REMOVED_STD_EXCHANGE.)
> 
> Glen

+1. But it would also have exactly the same effect as
BOOST_NO_CXX14_STD_EXCHANGE, so perhaps that could also be used instead of
BOOST_NO_STD_EXCHANGE.

Marcel

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/config-What-to-call-macros-to-indicate-deprecated-removed-components-tp4693762p4693768.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.