Re: [boost] [core] [noncopyable] Add nonmoveable?

Subject: Re: [boost] [core] [noncopyable] Add nonmoveable?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-27 00:21:42

On 27/04/2017 11:23, I wrote:
> If your data members aren't the reason you're constraining movability,
> then why do it at all?

Incidentally, including a mutex in the class members (which is probably 
fairly common in multithreaded applications or libraries) also 
inherently constrains the class; mutexes (whether std::mutex or from 
Boost.Thread) are also neither copyable nor movable, and these traits 
pass on to the containing class by default.