Subject: Re: [boost] [integer][math]Heads up on revised gcd/lcm code
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-04-29 17:49:02
> Sorry about the multiple posts. I have been having some trouble with
> Thunderbird. I think it is fixed now.
No problem, for some reason I lost all boost messages for a couple of
days.... but I see from the archives you replied as below:
>With 12.3 I see:
>I can not see why it fails to compile and no reason seems to be given.
It's a compile-fail test, which compiles when it should not - as I
understand it, it tries to create a 65-bit integer which should of
I assume it's a compiler bug, but either way, nothing has changed in
that code for years.
>With 12.2 I still see:
>"../../../boost/cstdint.hpp", line 381: Error: uintptr_t is not defined.
>1 Error(s) detected.
That's weird, it should have been fixed in
- solaris.hpp unconditionally defines BOOST_HAS_STDINT_H so that
pp-branch should only be taken when INTPTR_MAX is defined and ::intptr
actually exists. Or are you on red-hat? In which case are you able to
figure out why that pp-branch is taken?
--- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk