Subject: Re: [boost] [review] **NEXT WEEK** Review of Outcome (starts Fri-19-May)
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-14 00:00:54
My apologies, when my brain saw "expected" it also saw
"__builtin_expect" and I immediately assumed an unlikely/likely proposal
- of course that's not what it is. My bad :)
On 13/05/2017 12:17 p.m., Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
> On 13/05/2017 00:53, Soul Studios via Boost wrote:
>> Sounds useful.
>> I welcome a 'expected' implementation, even if, in my testing, results
>> from this sort of thing are highly CPU-dependent and non-intuitive.
> Can you clarify?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk