Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Outcome and the C++ standard proposals
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-20 18:22:27

Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> * D0323R2 -*A proposal to add a utility class to represent expected monad
> *(Revision 4) -

Vicente, can you please explain why the expected<> proposal encourages
returning error_condition instead of error_code? This makes no sense.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at