Re: [boost] Request for endorsements for mp11

Subject: Re: [boost] Request for endorsements for mp11
From: Joaquin M López Muñoz (joaquinlopezmunoz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-22 17:32:21

El 22/05/2017 a las 13:43, Peter Dimov via Boost escribió:
> Would anyone be so kind as to formally endorse mp11 as a candidate for 
> Boost?

I endorse mp11. In my view, mp11 serves as a low entry barrier 
replacement for
Boost.MPL taking advantage of C++11 and without the conceptual complexities
of Boost.Hana (which BTW requires C++14). Boost.Hana is a terrific 
library, but there's
definitely a place for mp11 for those of us metaprogramming the old 
MPL-way. When
I really want extra power and expressivity, I'll go for Hana.

Joaquín M López Muñoz