Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Outcome review - First questions
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-23 15:26:18
Niall Douglas wrote:
> Would you still say the above after considering my idea for a family of
> "rigorous" outcomes?
I must have missed that, sorry. I looked a few messages back in this thread
but didn't find it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk