Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] non-interface-related concerns
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-27 16:32:05

Next message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "[boost] [outcome] Exception safety guarantees"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [outcome] non-interface-related concerns"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] non-interface-related concerns"

>> Remember that file is C code, not C++ code, and it's Windows-only, so
>> the choice of number to string function is more limited.
>
> The standard C function for number-to-string is sprintf.

I believe it may allocate memory. itoa() may not, which is important for
signal handlers.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

Next message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "[boost] [outcome] Exception safety guarantees"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [outcome] non-interface-related concerns"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] non-interface-related concerns"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk