Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome (starts Fri-19-May)
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-27 16:54:37
On 5/27/17 6:55 AM, Niall Douglas via Boost wrote:
> I thus settled on doxygen as being the least worst of the alternatives ...
I do believe that a number of us - and like more users of boost - see a
problem. That is that they agree with me. But it's not nearly as easy
to address as one would first think. I don't want to denigrate Doxygen,
it's a real sincere effort and not without value - but the whole
literate programming thing needs more work.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk