Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Review of Outcome
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-29 11:19:38
Le 29/05/2017 Ã 01:25, Niall Douglas via Boost a Ã©crit :
>> The general idea of an error handling framework is sound, extremely
>> appealing, and I found it well explained in the documentation. I like
>> the concept very much and agree with many of the design decisions taken
>> throughout. Specifically, constraining the error type to be the fixed
>> std::error_code (or equivalent) and providing a wide accessor interface.
>> I don't consider expected<T, E> a particularly needed part of the
>> library; the focus should be on result<T> and outcome<T>, the two
>> classes that represent the error handling philosophy on which the
>> library is built.
Nial you remove always the part of the mail that say who sent it.
We are unable to see it other than using some specific tool.
Please, could you preserve the headers with the names in the discussion?
Thanks in advance,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk