Re: [boost] [outcome] Second high level summary of review feedback accepted so far

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Second high level summary of review feedback accepted so far
From: Vinnie Falco (vinnie.falco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-30 15:42:27

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Robert Ramey via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> So, if the author want's to, I believe he should be able to include CMake files

I naively assumed that the Outcome CMakeLists.txt was a
straightforward, self-contained affair. After all, how complicated
does it need to be for a library that provides 3 similar classes and a
handful of tests? I was wrong...