Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Second high level summary of review feedback accepted so far
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-05-31 20:45:41

On 31/05/2017 21:08, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 31/05/2017 à 14:04, Niall Douglas via Boost a écrit :
>> On 30/05/2017 22:28, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>>> Do we want to banish narrow contract in this library as if this kind of
>>> access was the leprose?
>> People have the statically checked varieties available to them if they
>> want narrow contracts.
> What if I want both?

You can't have a statically checked function which is always legal to
call. The static analyser couldn't claim calling it to be suspicious.


ned Productions Limited Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at