Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] Formal review
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-01 01:53:50

Mere moments ago, quoth I:
> Simplifying expected<T, E> into result<T> and outcome<T> makes sense,
> and the design of error_code_extended seems reasonable, including the
> content and ring buffer history.

Another related point that I forgot to mention:

The default ring buffer size seems too small, especially for
multi-threaded use. The docs specify that it's possible to enlarge it
but I worry this could be problematic if not consistently sized between
multiple translation units.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at