Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-01 18:58:29

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] To variant, or not to variant?"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [outcome] To variant, or not to variant?"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"

Niall Douglas wrote:

> And how well does it [your variant] work on VS2017?

I have it working, more or less.

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/pdimov/variant2/history

> My not particularly complicated toy variant-based Outcome ICEs VS2017, and
> that's using the shipped Dinkumware variant.

I'm so very familiar with that. :-)

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] To variant, or not to variant?"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [outcome] To variant, or not to variant?"
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"
Next in thread: Jonathan Wakely: "Re: [boost] [outcome] High level summary of review feedback accepted so far"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk