Re: [boost] [review] Outcome Review Report

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Outcome Review Report
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-06 12:59:10

charleyb123 wrote:

> It is perhaps ironic that the suitability of a proposed library as 
> providing vocabulary types and possibly evolving into a future standard 
> demands that the Library Author change the library’s stated purpose due to 
> this potential popularity;

The demand in this case was to actually _not_ change the library, as it 
fulfilled the vocabulary role well in its initial, submitted for review, 
design.