Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Outcome Review Report
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-06 12:59:10


charleyb123 wrote:

> It is perhaps ironic that the suitability of a proposed library as
> providing vocabulary types and possibly evolving into a future standard
> demands that the Library Author change the library’s stated purpose due to
> this potential popularity;

The demand in this case was to actually _not_ change the library, as it
fulfilled the vocabulary role well in its initial, submitted for review,
design.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk