Subject: Re: [boost] Noexcept
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-14 23:28:58
On 15/06/2017 07:52, Richard Hodges wrote:
> If developers do not understand RAII, then an afternoon of training can solve that.
> RAII is the foundation of correct c++. It is the fundamental guarantee of deterministic object state. A program without RAII is not worthy of consideration. The author may as well have used C.
> Perhaps there is an argument that says that RAII adds overhead to a programâs footprint. If things are that tight, fair enough.
Given that RAII is so fundamental to exception safety, it's surprising
that there isn't a vocabulary execute-lambda-inside-destructor type (eg.
"guard") in the STL, to replace cleanup/try-finally style code.
Granted, it's simple to write one yourself, but that seems like a poor
rationalisation to omit it, especially once lambdas became standard.
I suspect that the lack of such a type is probably a significant reason
exception-unsafe code ends up surviving -- it's more effort to write
RAII wrappers for code that you're not really expecting to encounter
exceptions in, even though you should.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk