Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for moving Boost to CMake
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-17 14:37:40
On 06/17/2017 07:57 AM, P F via Boost wrote:
> I donât think it does get the job done. Some boost libraries do more extensive testing in cmake than in the Boost.Build because it doesnât get the job done.
Are you talking about things like this:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk