Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Subject: Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-20 17:26:22

paul wrote:

> The trend exists because this is what works for large-scale building, 
> especially for 10000+ libraries.

This is what works when your build system is deficient, so it takes it a few 
hours to see that 9999 libraries haven't changed. Large-scale building done 
right is called Ninja.