Subject: Re: [boost] Cmake
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-25 17:52:53
Niall Douglas wrote:
> Ok, my wording wasn't clear: "the lack of disambiguation to cmake of
> header, static and shared libraries unfortunate"
Yes, as much as I like - in principle - the separate ::static/::shared
targets, they are an "innovation" that raises certain questions to which I
don't have satisfactory answers, so I felt that the initial cmake-ification
should not innovate in this area.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk