Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Build and Microsoft C2 clang
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-06-28 16:14:28
> On 27 June 2017 at 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> > kind of works. This cannot be considered a serious toolset though. Why
> > not use the LLVM Clang instead?
> Clang in the front, but VC in the back, it's a transpiler...
To be fair, I was referring to the Boost.Build support (to the extent there
is one) for this toolset, and not to its quality or utility. I also use it
from the VS IDE and it's pretty good for double-checking code or compiling
something which VC can't.
Nevertheless, for those who'd take the advice to use the LLVM one, here's
what I have in user-config from last time:
using clang : 4.0 :
<compileflags>-fmsc-version=1910 <linkflags>-fuse-ld=lld ;